The Best Logos Ever Designed Are Simple Not Interesting & Not Overworked

Why Designers Should Strive To Make Designs Simpler vs. More « Interesting ». Make your logo simpler, more legible and timeless vs. trying to be clever. The best logos in the world are often the simplest: Nike, Apple, Google, B&O, Levi’s, FedEx, CBS, UPS, Warner, Girl Scouts, ABC, United Airlines, American Airlines, and IBM to name a few. They often use very common typefaces like Helvetica or Futura and refrain from over embellishment. Still don’t believe us? Look at some of the most expensive luxury brands and study their logo.

In his newest book, Blair Enns talks about the value of logo design isn’t based on hours worked, or even the perceived quality of the design. To illustrate the point, he states, the Nike logo was designed for $100 while the Pepsi logo was $1 million. Is the million dollar logo better than the $100 logo? Is it worth 100,000 times more?

Designers often mistake the effort or cleverness of a logo as the hallmark of value. It is not. Furthermore, Michael Bierut says too much is made of a logo. A logo is only a very small aspect of the brand. It’s not the whole story just the opening paragraph of a long story.

Jijibaba logo designed by Astrid Starvo, Atlas
http://www.astridstavro.com

This is the Futur of Education— Disrupting the design education paradigm.

Want a deeper dive? Typography, Lettering, Sales & Marketing, Social Media and The Business of Design courses available here:
https://goo.gl/bRt5qd


Love the content? Become a sustaining member for $5/mo today.
https://goo.gl/uKcJ3N

Our BOOKLIST:
https://goo.gl/onrdxr

Kits & Proposals:
https://goo.gl/mSjuWQ

Visit our website:
https://www.thefutur.com

FREE resources:
https://goo.gl/Qh6gHr

OUR AFFILIATE LINKS*
Skillshare: https://goo.gl/YCo2uT
Amazon: https://goo.gl/K1bIhg
Creative Market: https://goo.gl/g4jlTE


Futur Podcast on iTunes: 🎙
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-futur/id1209219220?mt=2


Connect with us online:
https://www.facebook.com/theFuturisHere/

https://www.instagram.com/thefuturishere/


Credits:
Executive Producer– Chris Do
Host– Chris Do
Director– Erica Pead
Cinematography– Aaron Szekely, Mark Contreras
Editor– Stewart Schuster, Erica Pead
Futur Theme Music – Adam Sanborne http://www.adamsanborne.com
Annotations– Isaiah Nwukor
Typefaces: Futura, Din, Helvetica Neue
Futur theme song— Adam Sanborne

===
*By making a purchase through any of our affiliate links, we receive a very small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps us on our mission to provide quality education to you. Thank you.

50 réponses
  1. emergerq
    emergerq dit :

    Most designers try too hard. Simplicity is beautiful. A fashion logo cannot be compared to a industrial type logo. Two very different worlds.

    Répondre
  2. Phoenix MH83
    Phoenix MH83 dit :

    We were taught in school that a logo should be able to tell you something about the company. It should have a since of identity. People should have a since of what you do. Just about NONE of the logos you chose on that thumbnail do that lol they are just well established businesses now so the logo are recognized.

    Répondre
  3. Whilliam Haskins
    Whilliam Haskins dit :

    You can still have a simple logo that ends up being dated. The jiiibaba logo looks dated because of the font used. That’s why the younger guy had such an adverse reaction to it. The logo looks like it was made in the early 2000s and is due for a font update. It’s bulky, thick, and goofy looking because of the unequal thickness on the “a”s and “b”s. Yes you should go for simple overall, but just because a font is simple doesn’t mean it will last the test of time; the jiiibaba example used is proof of that.

    Répondre
  4. Kevin Christian
    Kevin Christian dit :

    When the young designer look the luxury brand they say "they’re not boring" – 0:42 but actually is, i think its a bias because they know its a big brand and famous, when they see the city steel logo they say " i dont get it, its boring 0:32 " when that brand goes up i believe they will say its good logo. its bias
    i love jijibaba logo its like community with the letter i .
    i think the city steel logo is amazing, pretty simple, and people love everything simple i guess but the typeface need a little modification.
    .
    .
    simplicity is good and memorable

    Répondre
  5. Filip Stojanovski
    Filip Stojanovski dit :

    People in my area where i live also generally dont understand that a logo is not an emblem, so what Chris said about fighting an uphill battle, i have to fight that AND trying to explain to them what will work and what wont.

    Répondre
  6. Her Thighness
    Her Thighness dit :

    "Those are cool!" I think what they’re noticing is that they recognize them and think the brands are cool…but the logos are ultra simple and ‘boring.’

    Répondre
  7. fivebythree
    fivebythree dit :

    On the "City Steel", the I is the elephant in the room. Check out the profile of an actual steel beam… Bloody brilliant! Doesn’t even need the C mark.

    Répondre
  8. Nelson Porras
    Nelson Porras dit :

    No offense, but is the guy with that Jr. Ron Jeremy mustache a designer? Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. The best logos don’t just have good form or just good function. They have both.

    Répondre
  9. Rolf Reiner
    Rolf Reiner dit :

    The letter i with "serif" mentioned is an obvious reference to the cross section of an i-beam, the quintessential element of steel construction

    Répondre
  10. Doodelay Explains
    Doodelay Explains dit :

    I love the conversational style of all this lol first time ever watching a video that combines the feel of radio with the aesthetic of a tutorial lol

    Répondre
  11. Phoenix MH83
    Phoenix MH83 dit :

    City steel logo makes no sense. Take away the words and look at just the logo. What comes to mind? Not city steel. Coming up with any simple elegant logo doesnt make it the best fit.

    Répondre
  12. Kyouhyung Kim
    Kyouhyung Kim dit :

    City Steel logo feels strong and solid. The shape and the color of the strokes resemble the H-beams, which are quite clever in my opinion. However, the kerning on the "STEEL" looks a bit inconsistent with the "CITY", and despite the clever details the overall outcome looks a bit generic.

    Répondre
  13. frank javier
    frank javier dit :

    There’s nothing wrong with boring clean and simple, many times it works. But there’s a massive unbalancing happening from the font to the logo. One is heavy bold and sturdy, while the other folds in its sleekness and leads to nowhere, it doesn’t serve a purpose. the color is doing more work than the logo. There’s no harmony between the two. The logo it’s self is hard to tie back into the "industrial" feel. The logo could’ve been an orange dot and wouldn’t have made any difference. Therefore it’s not captivating, I.E. Boring. That’s what ‘we’ mean. It’s not that it’s bad, or poorly executed, but it’s boring in the way that it simply doesn’t captivate the audience, nor does it contribute to the company name or attitude.

    If the logo would have been created in a triangle form, perhaps more like a pyramid, then it would create interest into the over all name. The pushback you’re getting is that it simply doesn’t tie together to make a cohesive uniformed identity.

    The mark would have to be used over time, over and over and over again before people associate it with the brand name. It doesn’t do it’s job on first glance, and THAT’s the issue, THAT’s where it’s boring.

    Répondre
  14. jjjuhor
    jjjuhor dit :

    City steel seems to me to be one generic hexagon logo. Type is good but emblem is forgettable. Also the green bluish desaturated background gives vibe of pollution to me, so not really that sure about that either.

    I get that you are their mentor, but their opinions actually made sense so you shouldnt judge them so blindly just cuz they are starting out.

    Répondre
  15. Zoe Ng
    Zoe Ng dit :

    I agree with you. Logos are supposed to be timeless and simple. It should be timeless, simple but also designed purposefully, having some subtle tie in with the concept. Also keep in mind for it to be clean, graceful and polished so that when it’s printed on smaller dimensions such as a namecard, it’s readable with ease, as well as being easily optimised on mobile. A logo doesn’t have to be too literal either, a little subtlety goes a long way. What’s important is you created an easy to recognise ‘face ‘to your brand. A brand is not a logo. A logo is part of a brand. That’s easily the simplest mistake for young designers (i have been a victim as well). Also, that checkered shirt dude seems arrogant lol.

    Répondre
  16. Nelson Porras
    Nelson Porras dit :

    Here’s a question you may be interested in answering on one of your next videos. I recently came across a project where a company wants to create a logo that will depict the company, but without using the name in any part of the logo. Of course you, like me, are probably thinking it will be a wordless mark of some king. Here’s the kicker. The logo needs to somehow read the company name without spelling it out. Hope this makes sense. This to me sounds like the challenge of all challenges in logo design, and I’ve been doing logo design for a long time.

    Répondre
  17. Glyn Dyer
    Glyn Dyer dit :

    Chris,
    You missed the letter “I” in CITY STEEL is a steel I-Beam in section. It’s the strongest part in the whole logo for me. It sells it and makes it interesting and not boring.

    Répondre
  18. Angery Angery
    Angery Angery dit :

    Okay. Life Plan =

    1. Create a way to easy logo
    2. Make a company
    3. Sell cloths which are way to expensive
    4. Copy from everyone else or put 0 work in it.
    5. Profit 💸💸💸

    Répondre
  19. Mark Langridge
    Mark Langridge dit :

    The bell bottoms remark is a very good point. Do you want your brand represented in bell bottoms, or a good suit? A good suit is simple, elegant, and timeless. It works for pretty much everything. I like that City Steel logo because it’s strong, simple, and it can work in a variety of configurations and applications for print, product, web, etc.

    Répondre
  20. Clint Jurgens
    Clint Jurgens dit :

    Your designers or interns (they really come across as that) are either ignorant, or playing that part of an ignorant client really well. But I’ve seen them before in previous vids and I really think your vids are better served without them. Either that, or they need to become better communicators and thinkers to add value to these vids.

    Répondre
  21. Teh LaughingMan
    Teh LaughingMan dit :

    I mostly agree with him, but how does one argue about trendy looks while wearing a straight brimmed hat which is the current douche trend of hat wearing. Curve that brim bro.

    Répondre
  22. Roberta Smoki
    Roberta Smoki dit :

    The best logo is one that is instantly recognized, for years and years. That’s what identity is about. NOT cute, doesn’t have to be clever.

    Répondre
  23. Welldoneyou
    Welldoneyou dit :

    Are the other people purposely trying to act dumb to good logo design? If they don’t understand the fundamentals of iconic and great logo design, then they’re surely in the wrong profession and should find another job. Because to me, it shows they don’t have the eye for design.

    Répondre
  24. VM CV
    VM CV dit :

    simple is good but the "graphical C" I need to agree with those guys. It’s not as good as it should be. Maybe it looks very complex.

    Répondre
  25. Such a BadDragon
    Such a BadDragon dit :

    My God, there’s such good quality content on this channel, yet I keep getting distracted by Chris in almost every video. He is so tense and controlling…At a point it felt like he would only listen to a sentence only if it started with "you’re right". He is clearly an expert in his field, but what you guys are doing here is first and foremost about communication and he’s struggling.

    Répondre
  26. Doodelay Explains
    Doodelay Explains dit :

    I kinda feel like your friend was saying that the logo is great but because logos aren’t mindblowing things to begin with, there’s nothing to gush about – even when looking at the best logos on earth one never fawns over it. They are more like a star in a constellation. An individual star isn’t particularly interesting inside of a constellation, but the image that all the stars create together makes or breaks your opinion of the constellation. In this case, the company brand.

    Répondre

Laisser un commentaire

Participez-vous à la discussion?
N'hésitez pas à contribuer!

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *